|
FSIC Messageboard
![]() Flame Wars
![]() Anybody else getting more hostile by the day?
|
| next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Anybody else getting more hostile by the day? |
|
DanW Pilot |
Are these terrorist mother fuckers still trying to hijack planes........? Am I the only one that is getting exponentially PISSED by the day? Plate glass windows...that's what we should make...big bombs...intense heat....sand melts when VERY HOT...grr I almost hit a peace protester at school today...... =< IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
Hmm... I havn't been following the news this evening. I didn't see anything about more hijacks. You REALLY want to start ww3 don't ya? Silly. IP: Logged |
|
wil Pilot |
Nobody wants a WWIII. And to hang that around America's neck, or even Dan's, is totally wrong. If this turns into that...its the world's fault. You can't wait for the next plane to fly into a nuclear power plant, or can you? That would be silly. I see no other option other than a very large world wide military operation. I'm really sorry about that. But sides have to be taken. IP: Logged |
|
DanW Pilot |
When Canada gets raped in broad daylight Spanky, then come talk to me and tell me how silly it is. IP: Logged |
|
Nat JAG |
WW3? Ofcourse it's comming, just not as you might expect, WW3 will be the world against terroism, not against each other, how do you get WW3 when all major and most minor nations agree that extreme meassuers must be undertaken, who are the 2 sides going to be? Every one with 20-20 vision can see there's not a chance of starting WW3 here, the thought alone is laughable. IP: Logged |
|
Wing Chaps Pilot |
DanW, What you said! The first two days, I couldn't really wrap my gut around the idea that we won't see those towers tomorrow, let alone around the numbers of casualties so high... But now, each day, I am getting more and more angry. I just hope we stay angry, for the long haul, 'til we root out each known terrorist cell, punish each nation that refuses to cooperate in irradicating each of those groups in their own borders. And we'd better get ready, mentally, for more. The Sears tower? The Tower of London? The Eiffel Tower? And you can be sure if they hit a target in Paris or London, Dublin, Tokyo, Seoul, or wherever, it'll be the same for me. Chaps out IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
If none of you can see how delicate this whole thing could be your freaking STUPID. Your fooling yourself, it doesn't take much to piss off a couple countries and end up with a war agasint most of the middle east. Ya get what I mean? Its not as easy to combat multiple countries on multiple fronts. Not to mention that you guys either seem to forget or think you are the shit, and never even consider that the russians just finished getting their ass handed to them a while back there. I know I Know, your different, your the shit, your the best country on the earth, fuck that, I hope it does turn into another nam, I hope you do get your ass handed back to ya. As long as no nukes touch down here I'll be fine. And you never really know what china is going to do, if they really do hate the states over there as some people belive, whats to stop them from doing something while the USA is busy? Do you think they really thought the things leading up to ww1 were going to turn into what it did? No not at the time. Dumb fucks.
[This message has been edited by Spanky the Mad Dog (edited 09-14-2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Jerry Pilot |
A lot of us would like to get you off this planet chickenshit. Anything I can do to help? IP: Logged |
|
Jerry Pilot |
Spanky says, " I hope it does turn into another nam, I hope you do get your ass handed back to ya." EAT SHIT AND DIE MOTHERFUCKER!! You're no better than the bastards who took down the WTC!! IP: Logged |
|
rattlesnake Pilot |
Hey Spanky - do me a favor - Get Bent! From some of the shit you have been posting Spanky it sounds like you think these fuc*ers were justified. Now you are hoping we have another Vietnam? We aren't going to go occupy a country - hopefully we will just strike -Hard! We didn't ask for a War. They attacked us! You are going to ruin your welcome with the Americans here real fast!
quote: I would bet mega $$ you would be the first one to move too ANOTHER county the minute Canada was attacked by a foreign power. Its pretty evident you're a coward and just want to be somewhere safe where you dont have to do any work and set at your computer all day making an ass of yourself. You're a Pro. I understand you dont want a War. We didn't want one either but we dont have a choice now. It is time to get rid of some of these terrorist bastards and show them we wont stand for this shit. Thanks for your support Spanky. IP: Logged |
|
DanW Pilot |
Shut up while you are ahead Spanky. "Its not as easy to combat multiple countries on multiple fronts. Not to mention that you guys either seem to forget or think you are the shit, and never even consider that the russians just finished getting their ass handed to them a while back there." We prevailed in WW2 fighting multiple fronts. We shall do it again. That's what makes us America. Also our allies will fight with us....from all over the world. You are either for us, or against us. You are a bad spokesperson for Canada. Oh, and please go fuck yourself. "your the best country on the earth" Exactly. Friday is a day of mourning , hopefully Monday will be a day of asswhipping. IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
Look guys for your information, as I pointed out I come from a military family. My real dad and my step dad were both in the US and Canadian airforce. Both my grandparents were in the Canadian airforce(not to sure about my real dads parents). I have considered joining myself in the past, I actually wanted to join the US (remember I am an American) cause you guys have attack helis and helis are my interest, but My eyesight wouldn't pass that test, its not 20/20. Anyways, that time has passed and I have choosen my course for my life, I have thought about joining the reserves but I want to be in better shape before that. I would join my country in defending it, and I would join the US in defending itself, I DON'T want to join in starting a massive world war though, which is what I feel you guys are heading for. Sorry if you can't see the situation for what it is. About wanting you to fail, I didn't actually mean that literally, I ment as a lesson. Americans are arrogent, and its freaking annoying. They think they can get away with anything. Why is it you were attacked? Maybe because of that. People keep saying wait till london is attacked, wait till Canada is attacked. Sorry guys I don't see that happening, cause we don't get other countries pissed at us. We are PEACE KEEPERS. We don't fund other peoples wars, or teach them how to fight. We aid them, not with guns but with food and supplies. Anyways you guys were attacked, and I truly feel for ya. Like I was saying yesterday to Werner, it makes me feel physicaly sick, not just sad. But I don't think you are fighting a country here and you guys seem to think there is a country you can blame. Its a people, a movment. Nukes and such don't work on people like that. Hell that might be what they want, They might be antagonizing you guys into something larger cause thats what they want. Like I said earlier, you guys don't trust China, what if they are behind this? Do you guys TRULY belive that this couldn't in anyway turn into something MUCH worse and MUCH larger if you go into Afghanastan with ground troops on a mass level (like going into Kuwait)and just start wiping out a whole country as if they whole population is your enemy?
I just don't support and actual take over and genocide of a country. Which is what some people are calling for, even you guys seem to be calling for it. Seriously, do you REALLY, I mean REALLY want to actually launch nukes at Afghanastan? Kill off a whole country!
IP: Logged |
|
Jerry Pilot |
Spanky, war and dying and even killing your enemies are not the worst things in the world. You seem to think they are. Living in terror and losing your freedom are much worse. If these terrorists and the people who support them chose to commit suicide, whether it's blowing themselves up or forcing someone else to blow them up, it's still their choice. We won't have to nuke or even kill anyone if they choose to live as civilized human beings and respect the lives of others. IP: Logged |
|
Smokey Pilot |
No, one city will suffice. The one that's hiding Bin Laden. IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
I never said it was the worst thing, Like I said I would join a valid cause, I won't join with a cause thats on a revenge trip. Thats what I find this is, just a revenge trip. At least make sure your taking out your revenge on the guilty parties and minimise killing others that arn't in any way guilty. Not everyone in that country or even city dicided to harbor terrorists. Find and punish those responsible, Thats what I would sign up for. Killing a whole country or even a whole city is NOT something I support. The terrorists are evil because they killed noncombatent innocents. What about all the inocents in a city? Do you feel they are all guilty? So when you joining up Jerry? Your so bent on revenge, go get your gun and join up! IP: Logged |
|
Wing Chaps Pilot |
As someone who is currently signed up, Spanky, let me ask you this: What is the proper response of a coalition of nations to someone like the Taliban of Afghanistan who have for years knowingly sheltered Bin Laden, allow the presence of training camps, and are making excuses for and continuing to shelter Bin Laden? Now spare me the sermon about how we don't kill everyone in the country, or how we don't wipe out any given entire city, because I'm with you on that. I'm asking: What do we do with a (portion of a*) country that refuses to hand over THE arch known terrorist? And let's posit the reasonable projection that when we present hard evidence that Bin Ladin is connected to terrorist activity, they blow that off and continue to refuse. What do you propose? I propose we START by, after the clear word is given to hand ALL terrorists over and to dismantle the training camps, and after their refusal, wiping out any military, industrial, and/or infrastructure targets we can find. We flat guarantee that the rebels the Taliban are fighting win. We also demonstrate that any nation involved in actively and knowingly sheltering such vermin will lose far more than they gain by their own standard. We give them a reason not to allow terrorism in their borders. Hit the industrial targets at night? Fine. I had a bully in Middle School, years ago, pester me (sensitive child that I was) to tears and fear. No words of reason could disuade him to leave me alone. He enjoyed his ability to mess with me. One day, in the gym locker room, he pushed me until I snapped, everything just whited out. When I came to myself, I took a step back, and he collapsed on the floor, beaten to an inch of his life by the bookish boy he had terrorized. That was the last day any bully in that school ever messed with me. Chaps out IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
Cool stuff, I have to go out right now but I'll write a responce later on tonight. I'm glad to see someone with a level head respond and not just attack me. Cya IP: Logged |
|
3dp Pilot |
Getting back to Spanky's original post, I think all he was trying to say was know your history and your current affairs very, very well before you rush headlong to action (or more likely for most of us, advocating an action). There are causes worth fighting and dying for and we (the West, not just the US) should not allow the fear of another Vietnam to blind us to seeing them (like it often does in my humble opinion). With geo-politics they way they are (Pakistan is a nuclear power after all), it's all in how and when you fight it. "Revenge is a dish best served cold". And I might add to that time honored saying, "and smart". ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
In response to 3dp Yeah thats pretty much it, take your time, make sure its only going to do what you want and not have it explode in your face. They want war. I think it all out war might be overboard but It woudln't really bug me. You guys can call me a pussy all ya want but I would rather not see any nukes used. Specialy not on US soil. I know you think it may happen from terrorists anyways, and your right it could but thats alot differnt then an all out exchange. Sorry if I would rather my son didn't grow up in the aftermath of a nuculear war. If you guys ARN'T afraid of nuculear war, then theres just something wrong or your letting your anger cloud your judgment.
But You better make sure you get the right guy, and even if you do, you better know you are a better fighter then him, or have more friends if he has a possee. Or have a bigger gun if he is packing, and even if you are better in every way (as the USA is over afghan) you never know who his friends are or what kind of power they possess (as in connections and money and crap) And what motivated the attack. And you better be ready for revenge against you.
Really, just think about it, think of the implications of your actions, do your homework, make sure you are in the right(which you are in this case of course), and do whatever you can do to improve your image so it doesn't just keep happening. Seems that people do that all the time, except they are throwing it all out the window now. [This message has been edited by Spanky the Mad Dog (edited 09-15-2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Nat JAG |
a much better worded post SpankyOn my own point of view, I must say I wouldn't be upset if tactical nucs were used on terrorist training camps, that said, being honest, we know that would never happen, any and all forms of nucs would only be used in a full scale war against another nuclear power, but tac nucs are the scarey weapon most civilians expect when they here "nuclear missle", I'm sure you know this also, but the world would totaly condem the use of them in this case, and the USA would never turn everyone against them like that, but I talk from my own opinion, and would not mind seeing them used, but as said, only on terrorist training camps, which are all out in the middle of the desert and way from populated areas. I'd have to do my checking, but, I don't think there are any ME countries that have nuclear weapons, I could easily be wrong, but I don't think there are, so although you can never be 100% certain, I doubt a full scale nuclear conflict could arise. OK, taking nuc's out of the equasion, that doesn't change my mind on what I believe realy needs to happen now. If proved beyond a reasonable doubt, that this is Bin Ladins work, then a sustained all out assault on Afganistan should be started. This will be costly in the long run as we must support the country afterwards, but thats all part of the price and only right and proper, after all, the Taliban took over there, they aren't in power because the country wants them. So, what do we do, we destroy Afganistan, starting with a totaly overwhelming assualt from bombers and strike aircraft, and ofcourse Cruise with FAE warheads. After this initial strike that should be directed at all camps, military bases/airports and power stations, strike aircraft can continue sorties destroying anything left of interest, this must be done for quiet sometime. Basicly we remove Afganistan as a Nation. OK, we've made an example of Afganistan, thats the military side over for the time being, everything else after this relies on intelligence, and and every possible lead must be followed, terrorists tracked down and killed or brought to justice. This was a failure of us in Northern Ireland, we knew almost every terrorist in NI, and where they were, but we opted to track them, not remove them, thats politics, but not good in stopping terrorism. We as a world must track terrorists and pick them up, not just watch what they are doing. OK, the thinking is they will lead you to someone higher, but this doesn't always work, but, as the snake dies without it's head, the head dies without the body. Remove the guys on the ground and you'll see a difference petty sharpish. Right now I realy believe we could be on the verge of a new world order, an acceptance of other nations, and working together with a common goal. We'll always squable about human rights and things like that, this is politicians jobs, they need that Take the fight to them, bring it down to their level, the only one they understand, violence. Hunt them down and take them out. Don't sit back hoping things will get better. MAKE the world a better place. It's all in our hands. IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
Ok WC, now I'll answer your question. Like I said its a pleasure to talk with someone who is not just blasting me and calling me names. Thank you K, this was your plan. -------------------- Yep let them know you have evidence against the people you seek, make it as overwhelming as you can, and have other countries review it and concur, hopefully try to get some arab nations join too, although that would be doubtfull. Then give the word, let it be known that you won't put up with any shit, and you won't put up with any resistance, then go in and take who you seek by force, including taking out anyone who bars your way. I agree that it could end up including civilians, and I can accept that as long as it is minimized, I'm still not convince that the avergage afghan peasent supports anything except keeping himself fed. Like I said if they stand in your way, take them out, but if not leave as many alone as possible, the last thing you are there to do is form even more hatred of americans, infact if so inclinded even help the people in any ways you can, show them that americans are nice people.
K now here is where we begin to seperate in what we would do. You say: See I'm not sure if destroying industrial and infrastructure is going to help much, I guess if your having a hard time because there factories still have power to make more weapons or you want to make sure their radar has no power, or their refineries aren't fueling their tanks, go for it. But be carefull of again increasing more hatred towards your country. Again we differ, you say aid the opposition to the Taliban, I would on the base issue maybe say yes, but do it behind the scenes if at all possible. Again when you fight alongside the rebles or just give them weapons you set your self up as the enemy of the taliban, I really feel that should be minimized, that may be unavoidable in this case though, so be it then I guess you just have to do it, as it seems the taliban just can't stay in power. IF a majority of the people would rather not live under their rule (who knows?). You go on to say: Yep fully support that, I don't think you will have to do much more then the above to show other countries that you won't put up with any shit anymore on this issue, I totally could see in other countries, using spec ops and such to extract known terrorists, but don't use unmarked helies and such, let them know who did it and why and ask for extradition first again of course. Of course minimize collateral damage again. Also continue any other methods in use or increase them, all at the same time, stuff such as economic sanctions and stuff. I know they are kinda weak but every little bit helps drive your point across.
Over all pretty much like you but I want to minimize damage to stuff that will hurt innocent people, It shouldn't be that hard considering how well the gulf war was done. About the image of the USA in the middle east, Lots of people don't like the us for one reason or another. I don't think you can demand complience only through fear. I really think you have to befriend the people. Doesn't the bible say something about that? What I mean is don't set yourself up as the enemy. Don't step into that role, help them, aid them. Show them that Americans are good people, make sure your soliders on the ground are kind and polite. You HAVE to foster a better world image of yourself. Yes your the one super power and yes you have alot to be proud of, but that also means you have to set a PERFECT example, and not play favorites. Really if you walk away from the middle east and just leave with the same image you have now or worse, things will not be any better. New terrorists will pop up, and the damage will be worse next time. [This message has been edited by Spanky the Mad Dog (edited 09-15-2001).] IP: Logged |
|
Spanky the Mad Dog Pilot |
Well Nat we have 2 different ideas, I'm not sure yours would work out that well, but ya never know. Most of you think mine won't work either. I guess we will see what path the US takes and see just how it turns out. If they try your way and it doesn't stop it can we try mine? I don't belive you can rule through fear, I think it will just foster even more hate. And I don't think the other arab nations will like it much either. Thats just what I think. MAYBE just Maybe if the USA sticks around for the REALLY long term. I'm talking 50 years or more, and doesn't turn it into a police state, Maybe they can show the people a better way of life and win over the decendats of those killed off and maimed. I really in my heart still don't belive that would work though, but it would be better then just leaving after leveling it. About nukes, I'm talking about the big boys. And I don't mean just ones in possesion by the ME countries. I'm talking China and such. Like I said the USA doens't trust China but they seem to never even think of them taking advantage of this whole situation or not liking something the USA does. God knows the image of the USA could use some improveing in red China. IP: Logged |
|
Jeeves JAG |
Spanky...you said: "People keep saying wait till london is attacked, wait till Canada is attacked. Sorry guys I don't see that happening, cause we don't get other countries pissed at us. We are PEACE KEEPERS. We don't fund other peoples wars, or teach them how to fight. We aid them, not with guns but with food and supplies." I hate to tell you man-- but the Taliban stated it would retaliate against anyone supporting a US attack....looks like everyone will be involved real soon. IP: Logged |
|
Todesvogel Pilot |
quote: The Muslims probably feel this way too, they think we are the Bully. Maybe we are, but they need to take care of their own problems with the real "enemy", not involve us. By involving us directly, they insure a more fearsom enemy. (like, turning the whole school against you, instead of just hitting the bully) IP: Logged |
|
Nat JAG |
Hi Spanky, to take all the crap out of my posts above, what I'm saying is to make an example of Afganistan, I wouldn't stay there and try to rule the country, but I would collapse it, destroying everything, let every other terrorist harbouring nation (or those of the future) understand what will happen if they get found out. This approach will cost us, we MUST then support the country we have destroyed, we must feed and supply it's people on a scale not undertaken before. All this to prove a simple point: Terrorism and those that harbor them will be attacked with extreme force, but we are willing to help those that fight with us against terrorism, and we will only destroy the people we need to, while helping the ordinary people of the land. Lets those people see what happens if their goverment supports terrorism, but also that they aren't the target, and we'll help them rebuild. I hope that this would help to build that new world that I believe we are on the verge of, if the steps we take together from now on are carefuly thought out. IP: Logged |
All times are CT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
(This site Copyright (c) 1999 Inertia LLC)
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c