FSIC Messageboard
  Help / FAQ
  Standardizing for Plane Pack use...

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Standardizing for Plane Pack use...
jedi
Pilot
posted 04-04- 11:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jedi   Click Here to Email jedi     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
OK, presumably there will be a Plane Pack 5.4, 5.5, etc. Say I want to put the Corsair in there. What "standard" do I need to modify the airplane to?

I'm pretty sure I can tweak the performance numbers to within a few percent of the real data, but what is the standard for damage modeling? Should I dismantle an 5.3a FW-190 and just use the same sorts of damage properties, adjusted slightly for the difference in "sturdiness" and different location of critical components, or is a step-by-step method listed somewhere? And has anyone looked at Laika's damage model for the Rata or the model being used on the WWI planes to see if a NEW "standard" should be adopted?

And I see lots of folks using their own "custom" airfoils now. But how exactly do you make one? I can come up with all the numbers I suppose, but that "wing extractor" thing has got to be about the most user UN-friendly piece of software I've ever seen It looks like I could just make a .ppf file for an airfoil, but in my research, I haven't seen any formulae or programs that yield the values for "dCL" and "dCd" etc, only the raw CL and Cd and so forth.

Don't need a tutorial necessarily, just point me in the right direction to look...

------------------
--jedi--

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Fighter Squadron Information Center

(This site Copyright (c) 1999 Inertia LLC)

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c