posted 03-26- 11:22 PM
Right now there are 3 ways this is apparently modeled. The P51 has the manifold pressure based on "carb temp." It comes up quickly on startup, and stays up the whole time the engine runs. The engine RPM is based on engine RPM, but the engines are not correctly modeling the effect of a constant speed prop, in which the RPM is set by the pilot, and then the prop will maintain that RPM as boost (manifold pressure) changes by varying prop blade angle. End result: P51 not very realistic on engine readouts.The P-47 has the manifold pressure rigged up the throttle, which is realistic (except that it will read pressure even with the engine shut off). The RPM is based on engine RPM. It works right on engine start and at low speed, but once you're airborne, it will again read 100% RPM all the time like a turboprop. Probably the best compromise tho.
The F4U has both manifold pressure and RPM rigged to the throttle. Both instruments show power setting. RPM not necessarily accurate, since constant speed props are adjustable with prop control, but not with throttle. Think Cessna 150 with a boost guage.
No "perfect" solution until the actual propeller RPM is able to be monitored by the sim and used for a dataQuery property.
------------------
--jedi--