posted 01-14- 09:21 PM
I have not yet, but I am starting this spring. I am looking into a Challenger 1.You are correct if you are using a chute, but if you go with a delta that is not true. In fact, not many things are more dangerous than a powered hang glider. But the powered chutes are better for the reasons you mentioned.
But people do get into trouble, especially with power lines and trees. A powered chute does not "fly" - it sort of floats where you point it, kinda 
It is the ultimate James Bond thing, fer sure 
I really like the fixed wing Ultralights- they have a great glide ratio so engine failure is not so dramatic as in a hang-glider type of craft. Also you can turn the engine off and thermal the sucker- nice and quiet like! You can get it amphibious so you can land on water or land. They take off and land in very small spaces.
Not all airports are ultralight friendly though. But a back yard will do 
People love ultralight aircraft flight because of the wind on the face and the ability to fly just over the tree tops. However it is the later that usually catches up to them. Many people hit power lines or unexpected bridges, etc. If you learn the area first it is a big help. I am looking forward to many flights at low altitude - and flights through puffy clouds. Flying rivers is fun if you know the hazards first.
I guess it all depends on how much of a dare devil you are. Some people consider any flight a risky venture. Ultralights are almost as safe as light aircraft - but powered chutes and powered hang gliders are more dangerous - from what I have read. I get the Ultralight magazine- it is OK, it does seem to have more on powered chuts/hnag gliders than on fixed wing though... but good stuff either way.
Also Ultralights need careful (but inexpensive) upkeep. Buying an old one is a bit risky- I will get a new one and do the final construction myself. You want to be careful about structural failure- it happens often to those who are not very maticulous about upkeep.
Another quesiton is 2 stroke or 4 stroke eninge? 2-stroke have a much better power to weight ration, but are much louder and less reliable. 4-stroke engines sound more quiet and tend not to quit like the 2-strokes. Also a 2-stroke uses a smaller prop, less drag when soaring 
It seems most people go for the 2-stroke, they figure that the safety issue is made up for becuase the 2-strokes can climb out so much better- power = life from what I have read. 2-stoke is cheaper to buy, install, and maintain as well.
You can take lessons in a comprable 2-seat as well- so you are used to your aircraft.
What I really want is a Stemme motor glider! Side by side seating in a leather trimmed cockpit - and a wonderful looking soaring machine! You need no one to run your wing thanks to your folding landing gear. Also you have a turbo prop so you can fly out of high alt fields. Once the prop folds into the nose you have a contest level glide ability.
But the coolest thing, you can sore at like 150+ knts with negative flaps! THe Stemme has much less drag than a normal aircrft - so you can go faster, further, longer - really good gas economy! You can not fit much in the way of lugage in though. But it is one of the safest aircraft in the world - amazing glide with a power option 
And all for $120,000 (150l with turbo and leather) new! Six month wait period though... 
------------------
-Sv =FC=
WWI in SDOE!