posted 06-17- 10:28 AM               

I will post a list of all the planes with links at FSCentral and make it available to anyone else running a website. . . IF someone who ISN'T involved in another project will step up and offer to create the page and keep it updated. ( This means I won't accept offers from Razer, Nat, Werner, WTG, Harman, Gustavo or anyone else building add ons). The format won't be difficult- One table with 3 columns- plane, builder(s), and a link.

Heck, I can even provide you with the tools needed to do this.

Anyone else tired of the complaining? Time for some of those in the community to step up and help those of us getting buried with too many projects.

Lot's of words being thrown around- let's see some action.

Oh yeah, if someone will send me a list of all the planes in PP 6.1, it can be included at the top of the page.

If you guys ever want to see some of the aircraft thse guys are working on finished, it's time to give a little help.
-----------------------------------
"Da Jug"

FM question: Which end does the propeller thingy go on?
Fighter Squadron Central
ICQ: 121447410

posted 06-17- 10:32 AM               

------------------

posted 06-17- 02:07 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Vmartini:
i can do it, i'm only down for canadian scramble missions.

---

See what I mean- It's always someone that is already doing something that steps up.

How come I never see the names of one of the people that complains about a problem volunteer? I have your names- next time you complain about something not being done, you will be reminded of your lack of willingness to DO anything.

Vmartinin, if no one else is willing, I'll take you up on it.

Thanks Argon,when you get it finalized, can you send the list of planes? Keep in mind, this iss a request for ongoing help. So once a plane pack is out, planes added at a later date will be updated and people will still have a list they can refer to.

Thanks for the link Razer, I want to get one up that covers all planes released as betas or finished, no matter what era. We can help Spin keep his updated that way too.
---------------------------------
"Da Jug"

FM question: Which end does the propeller thingy go on?
Fighter Squadron Central
ICQ: 121447410

posted 06-17- 05:29 PM               

German:

Albatros D.Va
Etrich A-II Taube
Fokker Dr.1a
Fokker D.VII
Fokker D.VIII
Fokker E.III
Graaf Zepplin
Observation Balloon
Pfalz D.IIIa

British:

Airco D.H.2
B.E.2c
Bristol F.2b
Bristol Scout D
S.E.5a
Sopwith Camel
Sopwith Pup
Sopwith Triplane

French:

Bleriot XI
Morane Saulnier N
Nieuport 17c1

Italian:

Caproni Ca.33

Russian:

posted 06-17- 06:05 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Da Jug head:
...How come I never see the names of one of the people that complains about a problem volunteer? I have your names- next time you complain about something not being done, you will be reminded of your lack of willingness to DO anything.

---

The truth is that anyone who Promotes SDOE is helping out. I made a positive review/comment about the sim which happened to live on DejaNews' front page for two weeks.

And for the record, my official contribution was in getting Activision to release the sim.

They were one inch from shit-canning SDOE (at a time when other sims like Flying Nightmares 2, Jane's A-10 and probably many others were being shit-canned for lack of potential profitability).

I did my part to get SDOE released (it may not have been perfect, but way better than nothing).

Others worked on the sim longer (like Mike Denny and Hector). But in its last month of QA before release, I gave Jimmie Hudson all the reasons as I could to keep the game moving through production testing.

Hell, I even almost got fired because I told Trevor, the producer, he didn't know shit after he said the SDOE P-38 should be able fly level with one wing missing.

I might have only been a QA cheerleader at Activision (as Denny was a better tester/QA Lead), I was one *ucking awesome chearleader at a time this program seemed to really need one.

posted 06-17- 07:14 PM               

Todesvogel - Thank You.

Werner

posted 06-17- 07:37 PM               

Complaining-
This model sucks. I could do better even though I don't have a 3D program

You people are so screwed, why don't you get some kind of organization

This planes a hack it doesn't perform at all like the real thing, maybe you should do more research

Constructive criticsm
There's a gap between the fuselage and th tail section when viewed from up close n an external view

It would help if an index page could be created with all of the related info in one spot. I don't know how to do this, but I'd appreciate it if someone could do this

I was flying the P-51 and I noticed it rolled slower than a 109G. I don't have the numbers but I read the P-51 had a better roll rate. Does one of these planes need adjusting?

Notice the difference is tone, wording, and a suggestion on how to solve the problem, even if you don't know how.

posted 06-17- 07:41 PM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Hawk:
So I don't see any of my planes on that list Razer. Do I have to submit them or what?

---

Hawk, e-mail them to me. I'll pass all the info on to the person who picks this up.