|
Author
|
Topic: ...my new site (only the look'n'feel)
|
gt
Pilot
|
posted 04-25- 08:56 AM
   
http://members.nbci.com/a872148/test/index.html opinions????? cheers
gt IP: Logged |
JG3_Jetlag
Pilot
|
posted 04-25- 09:15 AM
I think dsfsdf wewef wefweflekj wefef 23r 23r23r s dfsdf rrgr regwe wewef wefwef wefwefw wegewgwe wefewf gwe wefw ef gwegwg HHwe H w hWH WEwe h WE jt j6j 6& ew we hrew eewg wg WE weg hR rhR we wefwEg ew er!Love the logo  IP: Logged |
gt
Pilot
|
posted 04-25- 09:31 AM
what about resolution with 800x600????please more opinions ...I won't start with the whole stuff until I've gotten a couple of reply's tought's , etc. 
cheers
gt
IP: Logged |
Rendsburger
Pilot
|
posted 04-25- 10:12 AM
gt,
looks also nice in 800x600.
The links in the pull down menus didnīt work,page not found,but i guess you you havnīt added this sites until now.
Kick the EAW and the other stuff out ;-)
Nice pics.
Could be very cool if finished.Rendsburger IP: Logged |
3dp
Pilot
|
posted 04-26- 08:50 AM
Looks good, but some feedback was requested, so here it is!- The logo looks great but I'm not crazy about the fade out and then fade back in. I know what you're trying to do, but speaking as a designer, I don't think it works. Since you have the brown border around the logo, I'd just turn it up again after the "R" in "Hangar" and complete the box (filling the new area green like behind the rest of the logo and not fading it to grey since it would no longer need to match the backgrond). The "fade back in" graphic on the right could then be deleted. - I like the standing pilot, but I'd drop his size a bit. - What do you mean about 800x600? I'm running in 800x600 and it looks fine. I used to design for 640x480, but 800x600 now seems to be the defacto standard. All of the stuff above is meant to be constructive and is not meant harshly at all. Overall, it looks great! ------------------
Be seeing you,
3dp
Visit RAF Harkness! IP: Logged |
gt
Pilot
|
posted 04-26- 09:52 AM
thx I'm on it!gt IP: Logged |
Sunray
Pilot
|
posted 04-26- 10:17 AM
It's not "aircrafts". It's Aircraft. IP: Logged |
Werner Molders
JAG
|
posted 04-26- 11:30 AM
gt - I think your use of those 'period' graphics are great, I love those hues. Too many site (*cough* CFS2 online *cough*) go for that 2001 techie look for and it doesn't work imo. If I can make a small suggestion though, make a grey background that has a bit of texture to it, small, and then set it as your background gif. If done right you won't see any seams and I think it would add to the overall 'feel' of the page. Werner ------------------
Visit Abbeville Field Today!
 IP: Logged |
3dp
Pilot
|
posted 04-26- 01:35 PM
I have actually seen and heard "aircrafts", so I think both "aircrafts" and "aircraft" are legit plurals. That said, I don't like "aircrafts", it just sounds wrong to me (although as I've said, I don't think it is). Any English majors or proofreaders out there?------------------
Be seeing you,
3dp
Visit RAF Harkness! IP: Logged |
Gustavo
Pilot
|
posted 04-26- 02:17 PM
Happiness GT  IP: Logged |
FSIC Messageboard
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
