FSIC Messageboard
  SDOE General
  Tiff sizes

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Tiff sizes
Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 02:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Alright, after much praying and soul searching I am ready to continue on the Barracuda. Ok, first question. Is 336x336 a good tiff size? Here is a picture of the tiff.

I managed to squeeze all of the fuse and wings into one tiff (hmm.. now that I think of it, I am forgetting the horizontal stabalizers). So, will this be alright?

------------------

"Don't move, if we scatter, he'll pick us off! Stand Together!"~~Aladar

IP: Logged

JT
Pilot
posted 10-07- 02:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JT   Click Here to Email JT     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Layout looks good, but keep in mind that the game will resize that to 256x256... the maximum size for any tif in SDOE.

Also, unless there are any special markings that make the bottom surfaces of one wing different from the bottom surfaces of another, I would use the same bit of texture for both wings. That will, in turn, give you plenty of room for other stuff.

JT

IP: Logged

Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 03:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So you think I should resize to 256x256 and re-mapp? If I should, it wouldn't be too hard because I've only mapped the noze and fuse (witch, to my surprise, was rather easy).

IP: Logged

DanW
Pilot
posted 10-07- 03:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DanW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Chop it up into two 256x256 tiff files. Use repeating textures for the bottom parts of the wings front and back (since RAF had roundels on both sides)

This way you can squeeze more resolution out of the two files and have a better texture.

IP: Logged

JT
Pilot
posted 10-07- 03:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JT   Click Here to Email JT     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
>So you think I should resize to 256x256 and re-mapp?

As long as you shrink it down proportionally, you don't need to remap. A 336x336 texture is essentially the same as a 256x256 texture, but larger.

In any case, you can leave it at 336x336... just know that the game will shrink it to 256x256.


IP: Logged

Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 04:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So your saying if I shrink it to 256x256 I won't need to remap?

IP: Logged

JT
Pilot
posted 10-07- 04:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JT   Click Here to Email JT     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
>So your saying if I shrink it to 256x256 I won't need to remap?

Correct. You will not need to remap.

IP: Logged

Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 04:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Whew, thats great news. Thanks alot guys! Whoever said it was easier to map as you go was right!

[This message has been edited by Aladar (edited 10-07-2000).]

IP: Logged

Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 04:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I cant downsize it without it turning to crap. Help.

IP: Logged

DanW
Pilot
posted 10-07- 08:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DanW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What are you mapping in? max or ac3d?

IP: Logged

JT
Pilot
posted 10-07- 08:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for JT   Click Here to Email JT     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
>I cant downsize it without it turning to crap. Help.

In that case, you may need to follow Dan's suggestion... which means you'll probably have to remap.

IP: Logged

Aladar
Pilot
posted 10-07- 09:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aladar   Click Here to Email Aladar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I mean I cant downsize the Tiff without the tiff looking like crap. I use AC3d, well, looking at the colors, the black is what really stands out, maybe it wont when it blends in, or maybe I'll just let SDOE make it smaller.

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 10-07- 11:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I know 256x256 is the limit for glide, but doesn't SDOE allow larger textures in D3D? I was thinking it would be fun play with doubling the texture sizes to 512x512 and keep the same mapping.

TS

------------------
Patch It!

www.airsims.com

IP: Logged

Razer
Pilot
posted 10-08- 12:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Razer   Click Here to Email Razer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
what graphics program are you using to do the scheme?

------------------
Tony "Razer" Martin

"Making SDOE a dangerous Place, One plane at a time!"
FS Hangar

IP: Logged

DanW
Pilot
posted 10-08- 07:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DanW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You can't resize a bitmap that is so small to a lower resolution. Anytime you resample a bitmap, you loose graphics quality. You will have to re-paint the .tif at 256 x 256.

IP: Logged

Spanky the Mad Dog
Pilot
posted 10-08- 07:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Spanky the Mad Dog   Click Here to Email Spanky the Mad Dog     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Spanky here...

Why not just go with 2 256x256>? we are almost all using decent vid cards now. A couple planes are using 2 why not this one?

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Fighter Squadron Information Center

(This site Copyright (c) 1999 Inertia LLC)

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c