FSIC Messageboard
  SDOE General
  Are the FM's accurate?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Are the FM's accurate?
Snake
Pilot
posted 07-11- 03:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Snake   Click Here to Email Snake     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
When I fly I can never get the P-51 to outurn the FW-190 it always outurns me. Is this right? I'm jsut wondering I'm not sure either way.
I'm not complaining or anything.
Should the 51 outurn everything?
Thanks

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-11- 03:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Most info I have says the 190a4 should out turn the p51, one source says otherwise.

It could be the p51 had a turn advantage at very high altitude with combat flap setting but just me speculating.

TS

IP: Logged

Snake
Pilot
posted 07-11- 05:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Snake   Click Here to Email Snake     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for that Tailslide.

IP: Logged

Maury Markowitz
Pilot
posted 07-11- 09:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Maury Markowitz   Click Here to Email Maury Markowitz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tailslide:
Most info I have says the 190a4 should out turn the p51, one source says otherwise.

I've only seen the measures taken from WB and I was always suspect of them - as they say it's like the stick is attached to the stall horn.

Still I find it a bit tough to believe that the 190 could active outturn the 51, that wing area is way in the 51's favour, and isn't the power loading roughly the same?

Maury

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-11- 09:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

The p51 has higher wing loading than the 190a4. This generally indicates a poorer turn rate.

TS

IP: Logged

Kraftwerk
Pilot
posted 07-12- 02:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kraftwerk   Click Here to Email Kraftwerk     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One minor concern about the P-51 and 109 K4 I have is that they aren't capable of attaining their rated top speeds as they are now. The D Mustang won't hold 437 mph when firewalled even after a shallow dive run-up, and this is at 20000 feet. Same goes for the K4, after a shallow dive run up at max throttle it attained 452 mph but slowed down to a steady 415 at 20000 feet. (Most sources state top speed of 452 mph in level flight at 19,685 feet.) What gives here, are the HP or drag factors off?

IP: Logged

Maury Markowitz
Pilot
posted 07-12- 07:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Maury Markowitz   Click Here to Email Maury Markowitz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tailslide:
The p51 has higher wing loading than the 190a4. This generally indicates a poorer turn rate.

The numbers I have show 43lbs/ft^2 for the 51 and 45lbs/ft^2 for the 190A-3 (the only ones I could find!). This is based on 233.19ft and 10100lbs for a 51, and 8.30m2 and 3970kg (196ft^2 8734lbs) for the 190.

Add similar power loadings (about 1600hp, about 10k lbs), and the 51 should handle the 190 no problem in the turns, notably the later much heavier versions, the Dora is no contest.

Are my figures wrong? I got the 51 numbers from Baugher, and the 190 from http://www.fsb.hr/~ah951096/avi/fockwulf.html.

Maury

IP: Logged

Zurawski
Pilot
posted 07-12- 09:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zurawski   Click Here to Email Zurawski     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
...Kraft,

RE: the 109 top-speeds ...

The top-speeds are rated for a specific alttitude. I don't have my notes in front of me, however if you get them up to top-speed-alt, they well closely match their top-speeds ...

(I only know this because I did/am doing their FMs)

Note however, that I have "updated" FMs for all the 109 waiting on the back-burner for the next plane-pack. Things like "climb-rate" ... Speed-to-alt ... ground handeling, have all been addressed.

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 11:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Hi, I have 43lb/sqft for the p51d and 39 lb/sqft for the 190a3.

Heres the breakdown:

FW190A-3
==========
WingSpan: 34ft, 5 1/2in
Length : 29ft
Height: 13ft
Wing Area: 197 sq ft
Engine: BMW801 Dg radial rated at 1700hp

Loaded weight: 7,652lb
Wing Loading: 39 lb/ sq. ft
Maximum Speed: 399mph
Service Ceiling: 33,800ft
Rate of climb: c. 4,100 ft/min
Range: 644 miles


IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 11:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Maury, also check out the climb rate on the p51, I posted about this awhile back. I was able to reach 30,000 feet in 9 minutes instead of 13 minutes.

TS

[This message has been edited by Tailslide (edited 07-12-2000).]

IP: Logged

Snickers
Pilot
posted 07-12- 11:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Snickers   Click Here to Email Snickers     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tail -
What data do you have on the P-38. I really needs to be fixed. I f I have the speks I'll look at it....

------------------
Snickers
=FC=

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 11:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

What needs fixing on the p38?

IP: Logged

Pang
Pilot
posted 07-12- 03:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Pang   Click Here to Email Pang     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The P51d will have the correct numbers after the guys are done with the model. From what I've seen of it's progress, it's going to be pretty sweet.

------------------
Pang 33rd~GS
33rd Strike Group

IP: Logged

Snickers
Pilot
posted 07-12- 04:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Snickers   Click Here to Email Snickers     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Its top end speed....
Both the P-38 and the Mossie are under powered...
------------------
Snickers
=FC=

[This message has been edited by Snickers (edited 07-12-2000).]

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 05:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Top speed on the 5.3 mossie was calibrated to 375mph at 13,200 feet. The real mossie did 378mph.. its only off by 3 mph?

I didn't test the p38 after Zur updated it last, but here are some speeds and climb rates to check against..


--snip--
I have six books that list several different speeds and rates of climb for the P-38 keep in mind that all the rates of climb that I have seen are while maintaining an indicated airspeed of 180 mph up to 15K, 175 mph up to 25K, and 165 mph up to 35K
the lockheed p-38 lightning by warren m. bodie lists the rate of climb at 4,000 fpm at sea level tapering off to 2,900 fpm at 23,400
time to climb to 23,400 ft was 6.19 min for the P-38J

I have seen the rate of climb for a P-38J and L as high as 4,200 fpm at sea level

max speed at sea level was 345 mph
max speed at 23K was 421.5 mph for the P-38J

Fork-Tailed Devil: The P-38 by Martin Caidin lists the speed and rate of climb as so P-38J

rate of climb

3,900 fpm at 5,000 ft
3,600 fpm at 15,000 ft
3,100 fpm at 25,000 ft

max speed

360 mph at 5,000 ft
390 mph at 15,000 ft
406 mph at 20,000 ft
421 mph at 25,000 ft
426 mph at 30,000 ft

time to climb from a standing start

1.4 minutes to 5,000 ft
4.3 minutes to 15,000 ft
7.8 minutes to 25,000 ft

americas hundred thousand lists rates of climb and speed as so

rate of climb at altitude

3,800 fpm at sea level
3,700 fpm at 5,000 ft
3,500 fpm at 10,000 ft
3,300 fpm at 15,000 ft
2,950 fpm at 20,000 ft
2,400 fpm at 25,000 ft
1,750 fpm at 30,000 ft
1,100 fpm at 35,000 ft

these are the lowest figures that I have ever seen for this airplane. My pilots manual lists better rates of climb under military power than americas hundred thousand lists under wep power

speed at altitude americas hundred thousand

345 mph at sea level
365 mph at 5,000 ft
380 mph at 10,000 ft
390 mph at 15,000 ft
405 mph at 20,000 ft
420 mph at 25,000 ft
405 mph at 30,000 ft

the speed drop above 25K does not make alot of sense to me because the 38J and L could make wep power up to 28,700 ft acording to my pilots manual and could still pull 57" at 30K but, in americas hundred thousand they list the max hp figures a few thousand feet lower than the pilots manual for some reason

pilots manual lists rates of climb under miltary power 54" 1,425 hp time to altitude from a standing start at sea level

3,200 fpm at 180 mph ias at 5,000 ft in 2min
3,100 fpm at 178 mph ias at 10,000 ft in 4min
2,900 fpm at 175 mph ias at 15,000 ft in 5min
2,400 fpm at 170 mph ias at 25,000 ft in 9min
1,000 fpm at 165 mph ias at 35,000 ft in 15m

weight of all J and L's is listed as 17,400lbs. There is no real difference in a J or an L. late J's and L's were identical and the only difference between early J's and late J and L's are dive recovery flaps, power boosted ailerons and a few other minor changes that did not affect top speed nor rates of climb.

speed at altitude under max cont. power 44" or 1,100 hp in true air speed

388 mph tas at 30,000 ft 252 mph ias
374 mph tas at 25,000 ft 264 mph ias
361 mph tas at 20,000 ft 277 mph ias
348 mph tas at 15,000 ft 290 mph ias
340 mph tas at 12,000 ft 297 mph ias
331 mph tas at 9,000 ft 302 mph ias
321 mph tas at 6,000 ft 307 mph ias
311 mph tas at 3,000 ft 311 mph ias
302 mph tas at sea level 314 mph ias

rate of roll all P-38's with out power boosted ailerons in degrees per second in indicated air speed

25 degrees at 100 mph ias
37 degrees at 150 mph ias
50 degrees at 200 mph ias
63 degrees at 250 mph ias
77 degrees at 300 mph ias peak
50 degrees at 350 mph ias
45 degrees at 400 mph ias

with the boosted ailerons it is the same rate of roll up to 300 mph ias

25 degrees at 100 mph ias
37 degrees at 150 mph ias
50 degrees at 200 mph ias
63 degrees at 250 mph ias
77 degrees at 300 mph ias
95 degrees at 350 mph ias
110 degrees at 400 mph ias

dive speed all P-38s

mach .65 was the safe placarded limit on all
mach .67 buffet began
mach .72 nose began to tuck under
mach .74 dive tendency began
max speed a 38 could reach in a dive was 570 mph tas or mach .78, the above limits could be exceeded if the plane had dive recovery flaps

stalls spins

P-38 stall characteristics were rated by pilots as very good. Near stall speed the wing center section stalled first, and waring was given by noticeable shaking of the aircraft. The ailerons remained effective. In the clean configuration the one g stall, whether in power on or off condition, resulted in the 38 mushing straight forward. with a dirty plane one g stall there was a slight tendency for one wing to drop, but no tendency to spin, The nose then dropped slightly and the speed increased the wing would come up. In a high speed stall the result was the same, and as noted earlier, the plane could be urged around, shuddering all the way, in a tight "in and out of stall " turn.

stalling on one engine was different. The dead engine wing would drop viciously past the vertical, and the only way to recover was to back off power on the good engine and wait until speed built up so control could be regained. At least 2,000 feet of altitude would be lost in such a stall.

Deliberate spinning of the 38 was prohibited because the spin tended to flatten out after two or three turns. When that occorred the control column was forced back, and the engine power had to be used to get it forward. Before the spin flattened out recovery could be made with out using engine power by applying full opposite rudder and easing the control column forward.

stall speed at weight all P-38s pilots manual with engine power off

94 mph tas at 15,000 lbs gear and flaps up
100 mph tas at 17,000 lbs gear and flaps up
105 mph tas at 19,000 lbs gear and flaps up

69 mph tas at 15,000 lbs gear and flaps down
74 mph tas at 17,000 lbs gear and flaps down
78 mph tas at 19,000 lbs gear and flaps down

this is for a one g stall with the power off. sorry, but I do not have one g stall speeds for power on, but they would have to be just a tad slower with the power on.

I will list my data for the P-38F,G, and H later, but this is all I am going to post now cause it takes alot of time and there is alot of junk to post when you deal with an aircrafts performance from sea level to 40K Just remember that a J and L are identical in weight and performance


bolillo_loco posted 03-22-100 09:52 PM CT (US)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
forgot to say how far the dive speeds could be exceeded when using dive recovery flaps. my pilots manual as well as many other books says that you can exceed all the dive figures safely by 20 mph with the dive recovery flaps

in warren bodie's book the lockheed p-38 lightning it lists the performance
of the plane as so for a p-38j

maximum sl speed..........345 mph
maximum crit. alt. speed..421.5 mph wep 25,800ft
rate of climb sl..........4,000 fpm
rate of climb crit alt....2,900 fpm
time to crit. alt.........6.19 mins. to 23,400ft

martin caidin forktailed devil the p-38 lists the p-38j's performance as so

360 mph@5,000 ft
390 mph@15,000 ft
421 mph@25,000 ft
426 mph@30,000 ft

rate of climb
5K 3,900 fpm
15K 3,600 fpm
25K 3,100 fpm

time to climb from standing start

5k 1.4 min
15K 4.3 min
25K 7.8 min

he listed the top speed varied from 420-430 mph I have also seen a figure of
4,200 fpm climb for the J model at sl. all the other climb rates are not a
max all out climb but a sustained climb while maintaining an indicated air
speed of 180mph

I also have a pilots manual IBMN No. 0-87994-019-0 this manual does not list
speeds nor rates of climb under anything more than military power for rates
of climb and max. cont. for speeds

these are the rates of climb for a 38J from a standing start with an
airplane weight of 17,400 or combat weight under 54" military power or
1425hp. the figures above are for the same combat weight but using wep power

climb at 5K 3,200fpm@180mph ias reaching 5k in 2 min
climb at 10K 3,100fpm@178mph ias reaching 10K in 4 min
climb at 15K 2,900fpm@175mph ias reaching 15K in 5 min
climb at 25K 2,400fpm@170mph ias reaching 25K in 9 min
climb at 35K 1,000fpm@165mph ias reaching 35K in 15 min

the pilots manual lists these speeds for max cont power 44" or 1,100hp at a
combat weight of 17,400lbs
mph ias mph tas alt. ft.
252 or 388 30,000
264 or 374 25,000
277 or 361 20,000
290 or 348 15,000
297 or 340 12,000
302 or 331 9,000
307 or 321 6,000
311 or 311 3,000
314 or 302 S.L.

the 38J could make wep power or 1,600hp up to 28,700ft and this is the
altitude that it sould be the fastest not the 24 or 25k figure many list.

38J could make military power or 1,425 hp up to 29,000ft

wep power is listed as 57" at 30K

the dive is another source of controversy all the manuals or books I have
listed above give the 38 a max safe dive of mach .65 now we all know the
military always lists something very low. lockheed and naca list the 38J's
max speed as so

.67 mach buffeting begins
.72 mach nose tuck under begins
max speed no matter how far you dropped a lightining was mach .78 or 568mph
tas
the above dive speeds are for a 38 with out dive recovery flaps with the
flaps all the figures could be exceeded by 20 mph most 38 j's were either
built with these flaps or had them installed at a shop that did these mods
after the factory or at the front by mechanics. all L's were built with
these dive recovery flaps.

if you ever get a chance pick up americas hundred thousand by francis dean
it lists almost everything you ever wanted to know about any plane. I was
suprised to find that a 38 could out turn a 51b or d at very low speeds and
that a 38 never spun when stalled. the book lists that after about 2
constant max performance turns at low altitude and low speed that a 38 could
get onto a 51's tail. the 38 out turned a 47 all the time with or with out
flaps.

rates of roll. a 38 below 250 mph ias was no steller roller. it was average
at best, but above 250 mph ias it began to out roll both a 47 and a 51 until
at 350 mph ias it was rolling at 110 degrees per second easily out rolling
both a 47 and a 51

hp at altitude of all the american fighter planes the 38 had the best hp per
lb figure of all 12 or 13 american fighters built from altitudes of 10,000
ft on up to its ceiling of 44K

it was our fastest accelerating fighter bar none and above 34,000ft it
became our fastest beating a 47 or a 51 because they could not make as much
hp as a lightining could at those extreme altitudes.


[This message has been edited by Tailslide (edited 07-12-2000).]

IP: Logged

Zurawski
Pilot
posted 07-12- 05:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zurawski   Click Here to Email Zurawski     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
RE: FM work on the P-38

"BE MY GUEST!"

... It was by far the most difficult FM to work on ...

It's been tested that the 38 FM cannot reach it's max alt ... and climb-to-alt speed is low. Turn-speed is a very touchy subject ... the community ssemed to think the 38 could out-turn everything ... I've got stats that show that with-out flaps it's turn performance was marginally better than the P-47. However WITH flaps @ low speed it could almosy out-turn a Zero ...

So GO FOR IT! ... I wash my hands of that bugger!

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 05:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I just tested it at 384 mph @ 23,000 feet and 305 mph at sea level. Compared to the max continuous power in the pilot's manual this is close, but we usually calibrate for WEP power so it could be bumped up.

TS

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 05:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

What Zur said.. go for it snickers! The CG and control travels on the p38 were set to be the same as the real plane but other than that go nuts! I can send you alot more info if you are going to do this..

TS

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-12- 05:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I think once the climb rate and top speed get bumped up some you will find the extra power buys you some better turn rates when you are slow and hang the flaps out.

TS

IP: Logged

bomber
Pilot
posted 07-12- 07:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bomber   Click Here to Email bomber     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just for grins take a look at the specs for B17-2
http://www.b17flyingfortress.com/b17.html

IP: Logged

Kraftwerk
Pilot
posted 07-13- 03:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kraftwerk   Click Here to Email Kraftwerk     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Zur, RE: 109 speeds.

I tested the 109 K4 in level flight at 20000 feet. It's rated top speed alt is 19685 feet. Yet it couldn't even top 400 mph.
Then I climbed to 26000 and let 'er rip in a shallow dive and leveled off at 20000. I attained 460 mph but it soon dwindled off to 410-415 mph level.
I did the same with the mustang at 20000 feet but this might not be its correct top speed altitude.

IP: Logged

Snickers
Pilot
posted 07-14- 10:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Snickers   Click Here to Email Snickers     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tail -
THX for the info. Several persons besides myself will be looking at this. Not promising anything.... But we will look at it, (especialy now that we have numbers to shoot for).

BTW Zur, no slight of your excellent work was intended (I dont believe it was percieved that way, but making sure It figures I would want to pick up one one of the toughest ones...sound of Snickers rubbing his hands together...)

------------------
Snickers
=FC=

[This message has been edited by Snickers (edited 07-14-2000).]

IP: Logged

Zurawski
Pilot
posted 07-14- 11:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zurawski   Click Here to Email Zurawski     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
... Kraft,

I'll send you the ones I'm "sand-bagging" for the next PlanePack. If you could test these in a like fashion and let me know if there is an improvment ...

IP: Logged

Zurawski
Pilot
posted 07-14- 11:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zurawski   Click Here to Email Zurawski     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
... Snickers,

NO! ... No malace taken!

I know there were deficencies in her when I released ...

PLEASE ... work some magic ... and GOOD LUCK!

IP: Logged

Maury Markowitz
Pilot
posted 07-14- 12:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Maury Markowitz   Click Here to Email Maury Markowitz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tailslide:
Loaded weight: 7,652lb

This appears to be the big difference, my ref is about 1k heavier. Is my figure wrong? I used _loaded_ weights for both BTW, but my loaded weight for the 51 agrees with your figure so...

quote:
Rate of climb: c. 4,100 ft/min

Whoa, I've never seen claims over 3800 before, what's this source?

Maury

p.s. By the way TS, GREAT post on the 38! What do you think the chances of getting nose tuck into the model are?

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-14- 01:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Both the 190a4 and p51 info was from Mike Spick's fighter aces of the luftwaffe.

Alfred price's WW2 fighter conflict book says 8770 lbs, 44 lb/sqfeet. The US A4/U8 tests says 8580 pounds 205 sq feet wing area for 41.7 lb/sq feet. The UK A3 tests say 203 square feet wing area.

The climb rate is initial climb, I should have noted that. Sustained climb was three minutes to 10,000 feet.

Bjorn tried getting the nose tuck thing happening but since SDOE doesn't model compressibility it is really hard to get working.

TS

IP: Logged

kopper
JAG
posted 07-14- 11:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for kopper   Click Here to Email kopper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I just sent a whole bunch of stuff to Tailslide comparing the Spit to the FW and ME, Zeke to the F4U etc.

------------------
Kopper

Fortunae Nihil
(Nothing to Chance)
OPPs Making SDOE a Dangerous place.
One plane at a time.

IP: Logged

Maury Markowitz
Pilot
posted 07-16- 10:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Maury Markowitz   Click Here to Email Maury Markowitz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Tailslide:
Both the 190a4 and p51 info was from Mike Spick's fighter aces of the luftwaffe.

Alfred price's WW2 fighter conflict book says 8770 lbs, 44 lb/sqfeet. The US A4/U8 tests says 8580 pounds 205 sq feet wing area for 41.7 lb/sq feet. The UK A3 tests say 203 square feet wing area.


These figures are closer to what I saw in my quick hunt on the web. Any idea which one is closer to reality? It seems that 7.6klbs figure could be empty weight, but other than that 1k is hard to get rid of.

quote:
The climb rate is initial climb, I should have noted that. Sustained climb was three minutes to 10,000 feet.

Still, I've always seen initial climb for the 51 in the 3.8k area. I'll look it up.

quote:
Bjorn tried getting the nose tuck thing happening but since SDOE doesn't model compressibility it is really hard to get working.

Bummer. It's most annoying in the Zero, where I can do 400mph without any problems!

Maury

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 07-16- 02:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Maury, I really have no idea.

It could be the heavier figures are with an external fuel tank mounted, I notice the p38 pilots manual "fighter configuration" shows the stats with a single external fuel tank. The "escort configuration" shows the stats with two external tanks, and does not show stats at all without an external tank. If I can dig up the author's email address I'll ask him.

I tried fiddling with airAdvantage to get something like compressibility on the p38 an the Spit 1a.. at least it gets sluggish at high speeds. The 109 would also greatly benefit from a compressibility feature, it was supposed to be uncontrollable at 400mph.

TS

IP: Logged

Kraftwerk
Pilot
posted 07-17- 03:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kraftwerk   Click Here to Email Kraftwerk     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Zur, that'll be great!
That's not to say that your FM acheivements aren't appreciated, cause they are. Keep it up.

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Fighter Squadron Information Center

(This site Copyright (c) 1999 Inertia LLC)

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c