FSIC Messageboard
  SDOE General
  You guys all need to chill out!!

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   You guys all need to chill out!!
BULLET
Pilot
posted 04-01- 08:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BULLET   Click Here to Email BULLET     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm sure I'll catch shit for this.

Do we really need to fly ALL of the new planes online TODAY!!!!!!!!!!
M.H. is gone for a couple of days and everybody freaks out. The official release is comming, DAMN can't you wait a couple of days.

This is getting to be like a bunch of little kids in a sandbox fighting over the newest toys. Its totally out of control. There are over 400 people registered on this board most of whom probably just read it and don't post. If you were new to SDOE and just found this board, and had no idea what is going on
and saw all this crap what would you think?
Hell, I know whats going on and I still think its getting to be more trouble than its worth.

Razor makes a pack and everybody jumps his ass because its not official and stuff was left out. You were all itching to DL it though weren't ya.

Spoonman has the right idea but will he get the cooperation and TIME he needs to do it?
I can only hope.

Did you ever think that MAYBE a lot of people are staying offline till these problems are solved.

Zoycite I saw your---contribute or get out-- reply to Nat. GOOD ONE!! That kind of elitist bullshit will absoultely clear up the situation. If all of us who aren't open plane guru's followed your inciteful directions and left there would probably be a whopping 30 members left in this community. I'm sure that shooting down the same guys over and over and over and over and over would be a lot of fun.

Patience is a virtue. Think about that for a while.

IP: Logged

Nat
Pilot
posted 04-01- 08:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nat   Click Here to Email Nat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree Bullet.. every point.. I'd like to add something to it, but I can't, you pretty much summed up the way I'm feeling, let alone ppl that only read the forums. Almost everytime I've opened a message to read I've felt like putting a reply in there, that would simply read "~sigh~"

IP: Logged

ArgonV
Pilot
posted 04-01- 08:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ArgonV   Click Here to Email ArgonV     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here here!

IP: Logged

Raider
Pilot
posted 04-02- 11:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Raider   Click Here to Email Raider     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bullet, you will not catch shit from me. I agree...This is a game and is ment to be enjoyed. Why are new people joining our forum? I mean you can hardly find SDOE on a store shelve anymore. So if they went on the internet to buy it they must have heard
something about it or found this forum.

I don't know how I would feel if I just got the game and happened to find this forum. Then trying to sort out what I need.

Patch 1.5
Plane Pack 5.3 / a
Keyboard instructions.
All the add ons / where to put them.
How do I use Winzip to unzip into the right directory? (If I had not used it before)

I think that before we ring the bell and say "Look here, SDOE has some great new stuff" we should make it easier for the new people we are trying to attract.

Everyone should be free to contribute if they want or can. There are things I wish I could change, but I don't know how. So for some their contribution is to point out what they would like to see change. Newer members to this forum don't know that it may have been mentioned 100 times before but they are tring to contribute to make the game a little more enjoyable to themselves as well as others.

So Chill out (enjoy the game)
Say what you think (don't expect everyone to agree with you)
Do what you can to make things better (especially for new people)

------------------
Raider 33rd~GS
Raiders Site

[This message has been edited by Raider (edited 04-02-2000).]

IP: Logged

Zoycite
JAG
posted 04-02- 01:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zoycite   Click Here to Email Zoycite     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Since I have been mentioned by name let me reply.

Bullet you obvioulsy didnt read the thread that went along with Nat ranting. And after his bashing of the guys working "for free" to make this game better for all, I had this to say.

"Criticism can be constructive and helpful if voiced right. Merly stating that F@^#*'n this and S&%# that isnt really much of a help especially when you are trying to get people motivated to try to correct issues that you find anoying.

Helping or contributing isnt just modeling or skins or even terrains, but as working with a group to achieve a common goal. Even simple beta testing for a project can help more than you could ever know. But simple irate ranting isnt the answer IMO."

I still feel this way and probably always will. And yes if people new or old simply want to degrade others work with useless insults, then I still have this to say. Enjoy B17-II.

I guess what that means is if you can only bitch and offer no "consturctive" critisim, by merly stating something, like "PP.5.4....I shit it" then yes if you have nothing to offer in the way of help, then Dont BITCH!"

And Raider is very correct in that this the same stuff we have been hearing for over a year now and really you just get a little sick of it.

Bullet Flame away, cause really it dosnt bother me in the least =P

Oh and BTW I thought it was already the same 30 guys to shoot at

------------------
Zoycite 33rd~GS

visit The War Paint Factory

IP: Logged

Nat
Pilot
posted 04-02- 07:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nat   Click Here to Email Nat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I went with the constructive critisim when 5.3 and 5.3a were released, Reaper has said that a patch is being worked on to fix the bugs, that I'm happy with, but I'll tell you, I will never agree to that idea of "oh sod all the bugs in this version, lets just make everyone d/l a new version instead". I'm so sorry if I upset ppl about this but it's wrong, and I think the post from Raider says the same thing in a rather nicer way, attract ppl to the game, let the users enjoy it, we'll I'm sorry, but 5.3 has alot of bugs, that never got fixed... sooner or later expect the ppl that are using it to start to complain. Yes it's for free, yes alot of hard work went into it, yes that is all appreciated, but... this is my game, I payed for it, yes I could say sod it and just remove the pack, but I don't want to do that because for one, I like it generally, and 2, you made this bug filled pack the online standard, so if I wanna fly online, I HAVE to have it!

Now I expect that you have bitched at me so much because you were one of the team that put it together, thats ok, defend it if you can, but I'm sorry, in 5.2 I never found bugs, and like I said, the bugs in 5.3 are little things, OK, I don't build planes, but is it so hard to put the map views right, or at the very least to release the patch for the 262 (which I've now been asked for alot, and given out).

Don't talk to me about having to wait for 5.4 so that 5.3 will work, thats plain stupid, finish what you start, we're all having to use this. That contribute or leave shit is wearing really really thin, and is so predicatable I knew someone would use it, thats why I didn't say don't bother in my origonal post, so that we could slap the person down for being so damn lame when it was used.

I might have gone OTT or been somewhat offensive in my comments, but hey, lifes a bitch aint it. To me there's no better sim out there, I love it, and I love the stuff the guys are making, and I suspect the lack of patches for 5.3 is none of the actual builders faults, since the 262 has a patch that the "team" never released.

I stick by everything I said, because it wasn't exaggerated, or untrue, just plain simple facts that seem to have hit a nerve.. truth does hurt sometimes.

It is wrong, and bad practice to consider a new plane pack before the one we're using is fixed, UNLESS the bugs are so bad that a patch would be as big as the pack itself, but in the case of 5.3 I doubt that very much.

Oh, I see by your ideas on what "contribution" actually is that you now say I do contribute, well, there's one point gained

Oh, degrade others work with useless insults... hmmm... well, insults are usually lies, sorry, I haven't lied about anything yet, and the builders degraded their own work if any degridation was made, the simple fact of being happy releasing a project and leaving it bug filled kinda speaks for itself IMO.

Now I don't see that there's much point in me posting about this again, because the simple facts are obvious to all. Reaper has said there is work in progress to fix the bugs, and that is so good to hear, and to be very much commended. And once fixed, 5.3 will be a great base to build future packs upon.

Again I say, Yes, this has been very much a flame, BUT, don't be fooled by it into thinking the work isn't appreciated, if the work wasn't appreciated, you'd never have gotten this flame from the usually quiet and reserved ~Nat~ I don't bitch about things that mean nothing to me, I bitch to prevoke a response, and that I have gotten, and in Reaper, the response I was looking for, that this is being looked into, and for others, that yes, it matters to us out here whats going on. We care.


hhmmm.. rather a long post, damn I hope I worded it right.

~Nat~

IP: Logged

BULLET
Pilot
posted 04-02- 08:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BULLET   Click Here to Email BULLET     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Look maybe it was a flame maybe it wasn't. I just consider it observations. I love this sim and will stick with it regardless of all the issues. I think that all of the work being done FOR FREE is overall good quality stuff. I used to work for a small game production company and I know how much guys are getting paid to produce the kind of work that you guys are doing for free. You guys RRREEEEAAALLLLYYY love this sim. As you should, because you are an intergal part of the world you are creating.

One thing I learned working in the gaming community is that you have to aim for the lowest common denominator when you release something. I am NOT saying that is what should be done here, BUT, the easier things are for the end users the happier everybody will be. When something is put out for general release and it isn't just perfect and easy to use people will complain(like many have about the initial release of this sim). Right now getting online and the online standard are a lot more trouble than they should be. I really don't have this problem cause when I go online there is usually nobody there.

By setting the game up this way MH has inadvertently created a SDOE post production company. People producing planes, terrains, ground objects, skins, and more all at a rate that the best shops would be proud of.
I am working of a bunch of skins, when I am happy with the quality level they will be free to the world if someone will post them. I'm sure that everyone is proud of their work and wants to show off. But the speed at which all the new releases are comming is obviously causing mass confusion. Not to mention mis-matches.

What I'm saying is that if the Hellcat is ready for final release great. Sit on it for a while till the P-40, the B-24, the Catalina and the Stuka are ready too. Then release them all at once. If a new plan pack were released every three months, that should give everybody enough time to get up to speed and make sure that all the bugs are dead before the release, and maybe enough time to really enjoy the previous release.

IP: Logged

Nat
Pilot
posted 04-02- 08:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nat   Click Here to Email Nat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
it's not a bad idea for the most part about holding back release, but I'm sure most of the worls will agree that us modem users find in somewhat of a pain, so I have to say I'm happy with single releases, they are quick to d/l and install, and bugs usually get sorted out, if for no other reason than pure pride in their work. There;s no reason why an individual a/c release can't be made part of the online standard after a short period of time, but agreed, this could cause more confusion than constant pack releases. I honestly think that a pack every 4/6 months is enough, if there is a willingness to fix a pack that has errors. If everyone were on atleast Cable I'd not mind, but 12mb on a modem is a big d/l.

IP: Logged

slk
unregistered
posted 04-02- 09:08 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is the best post I've read in this forum. And well handled by both sides.
Siskil and Ebert give it two thumbs up, thanks...
Psi

IP: Logged

DanW
Pilot
posted 04-02- 09:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DanW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You guys have to realize is that the reason there are so many different versions of aircraft floating around is because they were made for the SDOE contest. Originally, the deadline was March 20th. People simply ran out of time, and released their best effort. I think the only person that could actually call his aircraft complete at the deadline was Mposis, since his planes have been out for a very long time.

You can't hold back on something when you have deadline, it has to be released. Most of us were working up until zero hour to get the aircraft ready. The contest date got pushed back which led to the confusion that you are seeing now. And, since teams and individuals are constanlty tweaking their entries, it will likely never straighten out.

IP: Logged

Propwash
Pilot
posted 04-02- 09:29 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Propwash     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nevermind, Ill just sit back and watch, lol.

IP: Logged

Zoycite
JAG
posted 04-02- 09:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Zoycite   Click Here to Email Zoycite     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Actually I had nothing to do with the PP nor will I ever. But tell me how is this comment constructive? "PP.5.4....I shit it" Thats really constructive or maybe I'm missing something.

I also have to disagree with having to put out patch after pacth to get a plane pack up to your standards. This only causes even more confusion IMO. Again PP 5.3 was a great improvement from 5.2 and I'm egerly awaiting PP 5.4. Good Luck Kopper and crew

Oh and yes life is a bitch, so I guess you'll be stuck with 5.3. Get used to it.

And since this getting to be like beating a dead horse, I will no longer comment on this subject.

{Yawn}

------------------
Zoycite 33rd~GS

visit The War Paint Factory

IP: Logged

Jv44~Siggi
Pilot
posted 04-02- 09:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jv44~Siggi   Click Here to Email Jv44~Siggi     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yay Nat! That was more like it!!! Good strong push with your flanks excellently covered...Sun Tzu would be proud of you, never mind me!

IP: Logged

esox
Pilot
posted 04-02- 10:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for esox   Click Here to Email esox     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I keep hearing over and over how 5.3a was "crap" and "full of bugs".

I am aware of bugs in the lanc and the 262. They have been acknowledged and have been fixed pending the release of 5.3b. What other bugs are there?

Esox=FC=

IP: Logged

BULLET
Pilot
posted 04-02- 10:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BULLET   Click Here to Email BULLET     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
NO NO NO the contest was a great idea and still is. I am very much looking forward to the final releases of these awesome planes. BUT these are not 5.3 and are loosely being considered online standard.

5.3 has been considered standard for approx. 2 months(give or take a couple of weeks)and is soon to be changed to reflect the contest release. People are already giving up on 5.3 and waiting for 5.4 (I dumped mine and went back to 5.2). I am as guilty of DL madness as everybody else. I have the Corsairs and I jumped on Razer's Ki-61 the day he posted it.

Does anybody know who is flying what? Maybe we should post a roster of callsigns and what you are flying. What ever PP has the most users should be online standard. A standard change shouldn't be made till like 30 or 40% are using the new pack. Advanced warning should be given when the change is made. If I remember right the change to 5.3 was made over 1 weekend with like 2 days notice. Thats a pretty abrupt change.

I really think we need to step back and organize a little.

Gee Prop I thought you would be knee deep in this one.

IP: Logged

Rattler
Pilot
posted 04-02- 11:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rattler   Click Here to Email Rattler     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
For all the reasons that have been all over this board the last 2 weeks:

I stopped dl'ing

Stopped installing

Stopped playing online.

Pretty much paused playing all together and am considering stopping reading up here also

Almost....

Maybe in a month the smoke will clear along with an addition from Mike H. and his crew.

I do agree with Official Quartly Releases.

And an Online Schedule of when folks can be found flying "X" Version of.........

a.WWI / WWII aircraft

b. PPX

C. PatchX

to avoid ALL confusion.

Given the Nature of SDoE and its Open Plane Design with its many developers this is simply destined to happen.

We need an Organized Schedule of Servers, PP's,Era of Aircraft,Patch Ver., Online Settings to be used, ect.

Its the only way

Rattler

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 04-02- 11:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Re: Bugs, I'm guilty of uber-ing the fw190a4 in 5.3 but between Loco, Juzz and Ishmael's comments the new version should be ok.

TS

------------------
TS Aircombat

IP: Logged

Nat
Pilot
posted 04-03- 04:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nat   Click Here to Email Nat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tail, Esox, the 190's are great, so what if they don't fly perfectly, thats not the bugs I'm really talking about, try using the inflight map views from time to time in them.. thats what I'm talking about mostly, it can't take much to fix them and roll it up with the patch for the 262 thats already done and post a B patch surely. I really don't mind if it handels better or worse then it's supposed to, I'm not a pilot so I'd never know, it's just a few little things that have been ignored and I don't see the sense in leaving them that way, it's not really a confidence booster for 5.4 being bug free now is it, and what happens then, we have that same attitude of.. oh well, if you can't contribute.. yadda yadda yadda ad infinitum You'll have to make do and wait for 5.5 see the point?

Thankyou Dear Sir.

IP: Logged

Sv
Pilot
posted 04-03- 08:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sv   Click Here to Email Sv     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There are just so many new planes because of th contest ending... of course there is gonna be a mess for a little while!!!

Please, DO chill out

------------------
-Sv =FC=

WWI in SDOE!


IP: Logged

Spyder
Pilot
posted 04-03- 08:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Spyder   Click Here to Email Spyder     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Fuck me, it's freezing out here. Can I come back in now?

------------------

IP: Logged

mposis
Pilot
posted 04-03- 09:19 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mposis   Click Here to Email mposis     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nat,

The map problem with the 190s will not be fixed because I don't know how. Since you said "it doesn't take too much to fix", maybe you can tell me how.

------------------
Glad I had my seatbelt on...


IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 04-03- 10:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

hehe

IP: Logged

Jv44~Siggi
Pilot
posted 04-03- 02:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Jv44~Siggi   Click Here to Email Jv44~Siggi     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Screw the bloody maps, jeez! How realistic are they anyway? Infinite padlock, star-trek maps, arcade crap. This sim deserves more than to be treated as a cheap thrill air-quake joke.

IP: Logged

Rattler
Pilot
posted 04-03- 02:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rattler   Click Here to Email Rattler     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I read ya loud and clear Siggi.

But, you gotta break thru a mentality thats hard to penatrate first,and disfigure some pretty big ego's along the road.

Rattler

IP: Logged

roadtoad
Pilot
posted 04-03- 02:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for roadtoad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yay Siggi !!!
Agree with you 110% .. the mismatches and missing stuff can be irritating for those who like airquake, but the deep-rooted problems that haven't even been approached are what hurts. LAN players only here, we're still using PP4, and while the new planes are enjoyed (I do the installs), the majority at the EAA hangar still prefer EAW because of these fundamental problems. -rt

IP: Logged

Ishmael
Pilot
posted 04-03- 04:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ishmael     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
er...Tailslide,(speaking very soft and with much reference as to not work on last nerve) I think the 190a3 and to some degree 190a8 need to be looked at in same department. I would help with some beta test, but don't have much time now. Too, when I can get some friends to fly online and we have mismatches they're starting to get angry w/ me hehe. I want them to see how good the sim is and appreciate the work you gents are doing and not get frustrated with it.

[This message has been edited by Ishmael (edited 04-03-2000).]

IP: Logged

Tailslide
Pilot
posted 04-03- 05:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tailslide   Click Here to Email Tailslide     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Hi Ishmael.. I'm not updating the other 190A variants but if someone else wants to I am documenting all my changes as I go.

TS

IP: Logged

Nat
Pilot
posted 04-03- 07:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nat   Click Here to Email Nat     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
oh my, did I rock the boat or something?

mposis, as I think I said, I don't/can't build aircraft, so it's news to me in all honesty that it's so hard to fix, but easier to build the whole thing. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not getting at you, it really was never said when the bugs list was first posted and added to that this was just too hard to fix.

Given that it is too hard to fix I accept that fully and completly as an answer, because it is an answer, and I know now that other than me distributing the patch for the 262 to those that want it (including a note not to try and use this patch online due to causing mismatches) that 5.3a can't and wont be patched. I'm happy with this because it's a definitive answer to all thats left of the bugs in 5.3a.

Thankyou for informing us that it can't easily be done, and a further patch will therefore not be forthcomming to fix this. Now I look forward to 5.4 becuase I know alot must have been learnt from 5.3

Thanks guys

~Nat~

the quote was "it can't take much to fix them and roll it up with the patch for the 262 thats already done and post a B patch surely"

having put the word "surely" to the end of the sentance, I thereby made it a question not a statement, I can't make a statement about something I don't know for sure.

[This message has been edited by Nat (edited 04-03-2000).]

IP: Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Fighter Squadron Information Center

(This site Copyright (c) 1999 Inertia LLC)

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c